Showing posts with label Comedy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Comedy. Show all posts

Tokyo Godfathers (2003)

Writers: Satoshi Kon and Keiko Nabumoto
Director: Satoshi Kon
Studio: Madhouse

First watched: 07/12/2024


Review contains ***SPOILERS*** for Tokyo Godfathers

Ratings:
OVERALL
NB: These are not weighted equally (if at all)
PlotStorytellingAnimationCharacters
66776



This film is so so lovely and despite the bleak and depressing subject matter of the story, leaves you feeling warm, comforted and hopeful. It was also a nice surprise that it's a Christmas film and it can definitely be strong shout for an unconventional festive favourite. Strangely, however, I would say that despite how much I loved the film, I didn't actually like it. Although it really does fill you up with all these warm fuzzy feelings, it doesn't actually have the hard story substance to support it. It kinda gives you these emotional climaxes with a bit of back-filled story context and real-world relatability but all of these moments are practically completely divorced from the main story. Even the main story itself is relatively shallow, with opportunities to reflect and ponder profound questions but it's not all that well constructed. So ultimately, it's all icing no cake but I won't pretend I've never eaten spoonfulls of icing by itself.

The characters are probably the best example of this all-fluff-no-fibre phenomenon. The 3 main characters of the story are all so incredibly interesting and joyfully unpredictable. This creates a really great dynamic that drives a lot of the film and the enigma surrounding each character's history and circumstances gets you really invested as a viewer. However all of this complexity and backstory is never adequately explained nor resolved. We get a glimpse of each of their past lives either through flashbacks or interactions with someone from their past but ultimately it's a passing conversation that gives a bit of context to where they are but very little else. None of the characters have a desire nor motivation and from what I can tell, their lives don't seem to have any kind of new direction following the events of the story. Also none of them face any repercussions for their past actions. Gin abandoned his daughter entirely and after (in)conveniently bumping into her, gets invited to her wedding. Miyuki also stabbed her father, who again she coincidentally bumps into but then we get no resolution nor reconciliation for their falling out. Everything is vague and quite pointless. The final member of the trio is Hana, who is also very interesting, however has the least story significance. She seems to act as both the comic relief for the film as well as the organiser and moral compass. Again, we get some really interesting back story for her but its fleeting and inconsequential.

Now of course, the point of the movie didn't go completely over my head. These characters each highlighted a host important issues in modern societies, like homelessness, poverty, alcoholism, gambling addiction, depression, the experiences of transgender women (both the fetishisation and the transphobic mistreatment), bereavement, family and all sorts of other things. And especially on the inclusion of a transgender woman as a main character, with a rich and meaningful backstory, the film was really pioneering and important for the people whose story it told, especially back in 2003!. So of course, I appreciate that greatly about the film and give it its props. But as I seem to say in every review, I think that truly good films highlight issues and convey themes or messages as part of an overall strong plot.

So moving onto the plot then. It's definitely fun. It's an out and out mystery story from the very start, with the gang trying to find out who this abandoned baby's parents are and why they would abandon the poor thing. The insane and hilarious jumps from place to place as we go on the journey to answer these questions is really entertaining and always holds your attention. Each different scene is completely different from the last, which makes for visual interest just as much as story intrigue. Now I won't say that it's completely disjointed, because the main thread of the story holds up quite well. However there are just too many other elements that are so coincidental they just become silly; like bumping into mobsters that Gin's had run-ins with before, the gang being stood right outside a store that an ambulance crashes straight into or Hana and Miyuki literally walking past Sachiko as she's about to jump off a bridge. It all makes for a very unsatisfying story, especially since it sets up a mystery and clue hunt, so for everything to be so serendipitous feels very unfulfilling.

The storytelling is pretty strong. The film does a really great job of setting a tone and creating lots of different feelings. As you'd expect from Satoshi Kon, it also makes great use of the animation medium to exaggerate the expressions and actions on screen, as well as creating beautiful and imaginative imagery. I wouldn't say that the film does anything revolutionary with its framing or staging but overall it was definitely a positive.

Lastly then, the animation. As mentioned, there's a lot of great expression work throughout the film, however I did think it fell flat in some areas. First and foremost was the inconsistency of a lot of the drawings. Sometimes the facial features or even body propoprtions of the characters would just look completely different from shot to shot, to the extent that it did actually detract from the viewing experience a few times. For some reason it was really noticeable on Miyuki's face, which occasionally just seemed to be wrong, anatomically. Similarly, I don't think the animators or animation supervisor got the right balance of when to have fewer, simpler lines for long-distance shots and when to have detail for close-ups. Another area I found lacking but obviously undertand is just an industry standard was of course, the mouth-only speech animation. Won't hold that against them too much, though. Bigger picture, however, the animation is really good, really fluid interesting, underpinned by brilliant character and background art. So still a really well animated movie despite some flaws.

It sounds like I haven't got too much praise for Tokyo Godfathers but I do really think it's such a sweet and wonderful film. I can definitely see a lot of people watching this film today and absolutely loving it too! I just sadly can't give it an substantive score much higher than 'above average'.

FLCL (2000)

Creator & Director: Kazuya Tsurumaki
Writer: Yōji Enokido
Studio: Gainax, Production I.G

Finished first watch: 28/03/2021


Review contains ***SPOILERS*** for FLCL

Ratings:
OVERALL
NB: These are not weighted equally (if at all)
PlotStorytellingAnimationCharacters
53686


I watched FLCL because I thought it was regarded as a classic (although looking it up now, it's currently ranked #502 on MyAnimeList, so not too sure about that) but after watching it, I'd probably call it a very niche cult classic. It definitely isn't like most things you'll watch but probably isn't what most people would actually want to watch. It's not to my liking but there's tons of very obvious quality in it and with regard to the main thing I don't like about it, the incredibly vague and nonsensical story, you could probably spend all day picking and trying to decode, which is probably what people like about it (and I will probably read other people doing that once I've written this).

The main thing about FLCL for me is its overall feel, which is noisy, messy, and erratic. Through the entire show, there is constant, heavy rock music playing. That includes during dialogue, which just creates this horrible, muddy sensation in my brain - especially when the rock music includes vocals! It also just doesn't have the normal rhythm and flow of most TV/movies you'll watch; no exposition and development, things happen, people pop up, you're in different locations, it's all hapening, no real explanation. This isn't helped by the absolutely rapid dialogue, which is difficult enough to follow audibly but becomes genuinely impossible to keep up with when reading subs. I had to pause and rewind it multiple times in each episode. This was made even worse by all the footnotes to explain the constant cultural references. It'd be incredibly unfair to hold those two points against the show but I just accept that I am not the show's target audience, don't speak its language natively and am unfamiliar with the culture it's set in and as such, I didn't have a great experience watching it.

That said, it was nice to see nods of appreciation to the things I was able to recognise, like Evangelion, Lupin III, and, for some reason, South Park. It really paid its respects to animation that came before it.

The chaos and craziness does, however, translate very well into the visuals. You're still left with the same sense of absolute confusion and disbelief as to what is happeneing but it's so visually pleasing, that it becomes a happy confusion. So for example, a huge, inoccuous bump growing out of someone's head doesn't make much sense but the embarassment and discomfort of the character are incredibly clear, as is the sheer ridiculous size of the bump. I'm tempted to use a word like 'imagery' to describe some scenes, despite this being a literally visual medium, because what you see on screen is somewhat abstract but does its job of communicating feelings, sensations and situations perfectly, like the poems in those GCSE anthologies supposedly did. So that's a win for storytelling but as mentioned, there isn't much story to tell.

Through the very short 6 episodes, events and characters appear with no real explanation. To an extent, I'm happy with no explanation of how these things happen, e.g. how a robot appears out of a bump on someone's head, but what I'm not content with is a lack of explanation or even basic reasoning for the events of the series even happening. For example, why does this housekeeper appear? What is this supposed to mean for the main characters? Are these events real or are they a metaphor? And hy itroduce this space patrol organisation? Are they serious or not? It's generally, just quite incoherent.

Something that's more of a positive (not a huge one, mind) is the characters. The characters are somewhat complex and the series does a job of capturing the pseudo-complexity of teenaged angst. A few of them are slight cop-outs, like the Dad, but others do things that don't make sense but do make you want to understand them, like Mamimi - I thought she was really interesting the whole way through.

A positive that is definitely much stronger is the animation. It was phenomenal throughout. It's all done at quite a low framerate (guessing it's on 2s) and they showcase absolutely perfectly just how to make the most of that. The movement is fluid, because the really understand which kinds of movements can be reflected well and at eactly the right speed. If you broke it down, it would probably be a great example of why animation should be considered as a whole and no single frame can be good or ba in isolation. There are also some cuts where the view pans a full 360 degrees around the characters and they legitimately all jaw-dropping and it's almost unbelieavable that it's all done by hand. Lastly, I'll say that I really enjoyed how FLCL was allowed to just flitter in between genres whenever it fanced, meaning they could show off lots of different art styles and types of actions. All instances had really great, very strong poses too, which were distict but never broke the overall style/design.


Easily the pick of the bunch for those rotating shots. Unbelievably well executed.

Not sure if FLCL was a manga before it was an anime (although I strongly doubt it) but I did like how the early animation also incorporated comic panels and really played around with them as a storytelling mechanism. To be completely fair, with all the quirky things like this (which I still think made it hard to follow), they got their full use out of them nice and quickly, then moved on. They definitely didn't rinse anything until it became stale.

I don't really know what I epected when I sat down to watch FLCL but it isn't what I expected in the slightest. It might be worth watching if you're really interested in alternative styles in animation or maybe if you really do love broody, edgy exporations of unexplained feelings. But for me, it was only just about worth the time it took to watch its 6 episodes. Also I didn't like the music, which a lot of people seem keen on. 5/10.

Invader Zim: Enter the Florpus (2019)

Writer: Jhonen Vasquez
Directors: Hae Young Jung, Young Kyun Park, Jhonen Vasquez
Studio: Nickelodeon Animation Studio, Maven Animation Studio

Watched on: 12/12/2020

Review contains ***SPOILERS*** for Invader Zim: Enter the Florpus

Ratings:
OVERALL
NB: These are not weighted equally (if at all)
PlotStorytellingAnimationCharacters
77786


What a pleasant surprise. Went to watch this for some nostalgia and a bit of a laugh but it turned out to be way more fun than I'd anticipated. It's top quality in every department and so well considered throughout. I have no idea why this wasn't more of a hit.


The movie (short film?) starts strong, with a quick recap monologue set over a sick anime-style opening scene. That there is a masterstroke, right off the bat: it gets the viewer interested, explains the basic premise of the show but also makes it clear that this is years later, so distances this particular story from the main series. No need for you to go back and watch 27 episodes of Invader Zim - you're already in and it looks fantastic. (The sequence was also animated by Spencer Wan!)

The animation is very bloody good. Every pose, motion and expression has clearly had thought put into it. It's flash animation but from what I could tell, they didn't just have 1 rig for each character/face - when they wanted to exaggerate expressions (which was often), they redrew them and really pushed the boundaries, which worked amazingly well, without ever going off-style. Then obviously, there was a nice mini-love-letter to animation towards the end, with all the different animation styles being showcased as the 'alternate realities'. The best of the bunch was the genga/key animations, which still had timing charts and notes on them; really let the animators have their moment.
    Action-y sequences were also great. They used simple but clever methods to make things feel quite dynamic, like the warped, stretched dimensions of the backgrounds. In addition to that, effects animation and the few CGI spaceships etc. all blended well with the style of the film.

Some of those simple tricks to make their flash animation feel really dynamic

Maybe I'm just dumb but the story was actually good enough to keep me really entertained. Stuff fit together, made sense for all the different characters and even caught me out once. That's not to say it was perfect - there were definitely a fair few things that didn't need to be in there - but it was surprisingly good.

The directing was pretty great as well. Stuff only made sense for the characters because we had each of them showcased nice and plainly and they even managed to do it all in funny ways. The genuine lunacy of the show is still there too, which you have to give props for. I laughed a fair few times watching it and as mentioned, everything's really thoughtfully done. Lots of nice little details. All the animation goodness is of course encompassed in the direction as well, so lots of points for that. Side note - with the anime bit and the crazy, strong poses, I did get slight Jojo vibes from this. I wonder if it would be the same for the original.

So yeah, a nice surprise on a boring saturday. Would recommend.

A still from Spencer Wan's wicked opening scene.


Over the Garden Wall (2014)

Creator: Patrick McHale
Studio: Digital eMation

Completed viewing on 08/02/20

***SPOILERS***
OVERALL
NB: These are not weighted equally (if at all)
PlotStorytellingAnimationCharacters
88768


Over the Garden Wall is comfortably the best bang-per-buck series I've ever watched.
10 episodes, 10 minutes each and tells a complete, well-thought-out, fully explained story with very interesting characters.

Similar to Evangelion, the main character is a total coward. Where OTGW goes beyond Evangelion is in the nature of its character's cowardice. Where it's Shinji's fear, depression and lack of action throughout Evangelion that ultimately lead to people being put in danger, in this story, Wirt actually actively pushes other characters (especially those he should be protecting) towards danger in order to protect himself, often blaming them for his own failures.
Greg is a brilliant example of how childish innocence can breed a combination of high self belief and obliviousness (which ultimately lead to acts of what others would call courage). This may have made him a bit of an easy character to write but with the story ultimately being about growing up, the juxtaposition of these him and Wirt highlights all the insecurities and hang-ups that come with growing up and all the ways they can affect you.

One criticism I do have is the ultimate unimportance of Beatrice. She's an important character and plot device in the first half, however ends up being very unimportant and her story very very poorly explored or explained. The fact that Wirt gives her the golden scissors also means that she isn't even the hero of her own story. Also has to be said, she's the only female main character, so it makes all the above doubly disappointing.

Pacing of the story was great. There were one or two "filler" episodes but honestly, these helped to pace and develop the story. I also thought placing the entire backstory into episode 9 really was a masterstroke. This could easily have been sprinkled in throught the series but that would have left very little curiosity running throughout. It just felt like the most effective and impactful way to introduce the backstory, and more importantly only introduce it when it was absolutely and totally necessary. This meant that Wirt and Greg waking up back home also felt very familiar and their adventures in the unknown were (literally) more of a distant memory.

I could also describe Episode 10 as a mastercless in plot-writing. The reasoning behind almost the entire show was explained in about 3 minutes. Just like that, all loose ends (other than Beatrice's) were tied up. Also, the Woodsman and Wirt overcoming the Beast was reasonably satisfying from just a fan perspective, but the realisation of the truth behind the lamp was well done enough for it to be a surprise and still have a strong impact on revelation. The Woodsman serves as another example of how imperfect we become as we get older and Wirt ultimately decides he doesn't want to be like the Woodsman - he would rather be more like Greg.

It was also a great decision to show the body of the Beast under a sliver of light for only a split second and no longer and never again. They used the best tool you can get for scary monster character design - the viewer's imagination!

Episode 7 (the one with the girl doing the sweeping) was great example of well-executed misdirection. I will say that the format of a 10-minute episode does help this, because it's only as soon as an idea is introduced that the reveal/switcheroo can be made (whereas having to keep the viewer convinced for 10 additional minutes in between is much more difficult). Still a good episode and this series clearly does a little bit of everything.

The tone and setting of the series are also great. The 1800s-y feeling is really nice and nostalgic to viewers of all ages as well as just having great appeal. This was executed really well with costume design and settings but I think it was most effective with the music. Instrumentation and literally the sound quality really helped send the viewer that extra step into the past (the best example of this is John Crops's songs in the pilot episode!)

The characters met along the way weren't all exactly memorable but are all definitely interesting enough to hold your attention and uphold the overall tone. The talking horse was definitely a highlight.

Overall, OTGW was a slightly touching, very interesting and well-constructed story with excellent characters, used perfectly to highlight its themes.